Energy and Civilization A History By Vaclav Smil
2: Energy in Prehistory
Human walking costs about 75% less energy than both quadrupedal and bipedal walking in chimpanzees.
The
brain’s specific energy need is roughly 16 times that of skeletal
muscles, and the human brain claims 20–25% of resting metabolic energy, compared to 8–10% in other primates and just 3–5% in other mammals
Fish and Lockwood (2003), Leonard, Snodgrass, and Robertson (2007), and Hublin and Richards (2009) confirmed that diet
quality and brain mass have a significantly positive correlation in
primates, and better hominin diets, including meat, supported larger
brains, whose high energy need was partly offset by a reduced
gastrointestinal tract
While extant
nonhuman primates have more than 45% of their gut mass in the colon and
only 14–29% in the small intestine, in humans those shares are
reversed, with more than 56% in the small intestine and only 17–25% in
the colon, a clear indication of adaptation to high-quality,
energy-dense foods (meat, nuts) that can be digested in the small intestine.
Increased meat consumption also helps to explain human gains in body mass and height, as well as smaller jaws and teeth.
Whereas
allometric equations predict about five 50 kg mammals/km2, chimpanzee
densities are between 1.3 and 2.4 animals/km2, and the densities of
hunter-gatherers surviving into the twentieth century were well below
one person/km2 in warm climates, only 0.24 in the Old World and 0.4 in
the New World
Mollusk collecting, fishing, and
near-shore hunting of sea mammals sustained the highest foraging
densities and led to semipermanent, even permanent, settlements.
The coastal villages of the Pacific Northwest, with their large houses
and organized communal hunting of sea mammals, were exceptional in their
sedentism.
Generally less than 30% of the ingested phytomass
is digested; most of it is respired, and in mammals and birds only 1–2%
of it is converted into zoomass. As a result, the most commonly hunted
herbivores embodied less than 1% of the energy initially stored in the
phytomass of the ecosystems they inhabited. This reality explains why
hunters preferred to kill animals that combined a relatively large adult
body mass with high productivity and high territorial density: wild
pigs (90 kg) and deer and antelopes (mostly 25–500 kg) were common
targets.
In light of the unimpressive physical endowment of early humans and the absence of effective weapons, it is most likely that our ancestors were initially much better scavengers than hunters
Large
predators—lions, leopards, saber-toothed cats—often left behind
partially eaten herbivore carcasses. This meat, or at least the
nutritious bone marrow, could be reached by alert early humans before it
was devoured by vultures, hyenas, and other scavengers.
human
bipedalism and ability to sweat better than any other mammal made it
also possible to chase to exhaustion even the fastest herbivores
Horses
lose water at an hourly rate of 100 g/m2 of their skin, and camels lose
up to 250 g/m2, but people lose more than 500 g/m2, with peak rates of
more than 2 kg/hour
People can also drink less than they perspire, and make up for any temporary partial dehydration hours later. Running turned humans into diurnal, high-temperature predators that could chase animals to exhaustion
Hunters
running barefoot reduced their energy costs by about 4% (and had fewer
acute ankle and chronic lower leg injuries) than modern runners with
athletic shoes.
Late Pleistocene hunters may have
become so skillful that many students of the Quaternary era concluded
that hunting was largely (even completely) responsible for a relatively
rapid disappearance of the late Paleolithic megafauna, animals with a
body mass greater than 50 kg
All wild meat is an excellent
source of protein, but most of it contains very little fat, and hence it
has very low energy density—less than half that of grains for small,
lean mammals. Not surprisingly, there was a widespread hunting
preference for large and relatively fatty species.
Thanks to its high fat content (about 15%), salmon has an energy density (9.1 MJ/kg) nearly three times that of cod.
The
high energy density of blubber (about 36 MJ/kg) and muktuk (skin and
blubber, which also has a vitamin C content comparable to that of
grapefruit) resulted in a more than 2,000-fold energy gain in hunting.
A
food supply dependent on a few seasonal energy flows required
extensive, and often elaborate, storage. Storage practices included
caching in permafrost; drying and smoking of seafood, berries, and
meats; storing of seeds and roots; preservation in oil; and the making
of sausages, nut-meal cakes, and flours. Large-scale, long-term food
storage changed foragers’ attitudes toward time, work, and nature and
helped stabilize populations at higher densities
Comments
Post a Comment